고령자정년연장지원금반환처분등취소
2015Nu669 Revocation of disposal, etc. of subsidies for extension of retirement age for the aged.
A Stock Company
Head of Daegu Regional Employment and Labor Office Daegu District Office
Daegu District Court Decision 2015Guhap22129 Decided September 23, 2015
January 15, 2016
February 5, 2016
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Purport of claim
On August 6, 2014, the Defendant’s disposition of return of the aged retirement extension subsidy of KRW 72,747,770, and additional collection of KRW 145,495,540, and disposition of restricting the payment of new employment stabilization subsidy shall be revoked.
2. Purport of appeal
The part against the plaintiff falling under the order to revoke the below among the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked. The defendant shall revoke the disposition to return the retirement age extension subsidy for the plaintiff on August 6, 2014 and the additional collection of KRW 145,495,540 for the plaintiff on August 6, 2014.
3. Scope of the judgment of this court.
The plaintiff appealed against the whole judgment of the court of first instance, but the defendant voluntarily revoked the restriction on the payment of new employment stabilization subsidy in the trial.
Therefore, the scope of the court's adjudication is limited to the return of the above elderly retirement age extension subsidy and the revocation of the additional collection disposition.
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The grounds for the Plaintiff’s assertion in the trial while filing an appeal are not significantly different from the contents of the Plaintiff’s assertion in the first instance trial, and even if both the evidence submitted in the first instance trial and the evidence No. 19-1 and No. 2 submitted in the trial are examined, the first instance judgment rejecting the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable.
Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the statement on the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as is by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
The presiding judge, senior judge and public officer;
Judges Boli-a
For the purposes of judge