조사,감리결과조치 처분 취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the part to be cited in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act
2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which has been dismissed, below "B. Judgment" in the third side of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be added as follows.
B. 1) In a judicial review on discretionary action, the court should consider the room for determining the public interest based on the discretion of the administrative agency, and examine only whether the pertinent act is a deviation or abuse of discretionary authority without drawing a reader’s conclusion. Determination on whether such deviation or abuse of discretionary authority is subject to such determination, including misconception of facts, violation of the principle of proportionality and equality, and denial of the purpose or motive of the pertinent act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 2012Du16787, Apr. 10, 201; 98Du17593, Feb. 9, 201). 2) According to the evidence No. 3-1 through No. 3, the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service demanded the Plaintiff to submit data on October 30, 2013 on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s request for submission of materials on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s submission of materials on the grounds that the Plaintiff’s allegation number was consistent with each of subparagraphs 1 through 25 through 27, 2013.
The above circumstances also may be considered when examining the discretionary authority of the instant disposition, and the amended part of the financial statements shall be deemed to have been included in the Regulations on External Audit and Accounting, etc. [Attachment 2] of the Enforcement Rule of the Regulation on External Audit and Accounting, etc. (hereinafter “the Criteria for Determination of this case”).
3.(a)
2) Paragraph 2 does not meet the requirements for mitigation (the defendant shall submit preliminary examination data).