However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

피고인은 2014. 9. 5. 07:20경 C 싼타페 승용차를 운전하여 대전 대덕구 신일동 SK엔카 중고자동차 매매소 앞 도로를 대한통운 쪽에서 신탄진 쪽으로 편도 3차로 중 1차로를 따라 알 수 없는 속도로 진행하였는데, 그곳은 신호등이 설치된 교차로여서 속도를 줄이고 신호에 따라 안전하게 운전하여야 할 업무상 주의의무가 있었음에도, 이를 게을리 한 채 신호를 위반하여 좌회전 한 과실로 맞은편에서 진행신호에 따라 직진하여 오던 피해자 D(24세) 운전의 E 옵티마 승용차의 앞부분을 싼타페 승용차의 오른쪽 앞부분으로 들이받고 그 충격으로 싼타페 승용차가 옆으로 튕기면서 교차로 부근에 서 있던 피해자 F(58세)의 왼쪽 다리를 싼타페 승용차의 측면으로 들이받게 하였다.

The Defendant, by these occupational negligence, caused the injured party D to suffer injury to the victim G(24 years old) who was accompanied by the observer car, such as the left-hand dump fums, which requires the treatment for about two weeks, and the victim H(33 years old) who was accompanied by the observer car, caused the victim H(33 years old) who was accompanied by the observer car to receive approximately four weeks of medical treatment, and the victim F, who was in the vicinity of the intersection, caused the victim F, who was injured by the observer, to receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement concerning DGF;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act under the suspended sentence [the scope of recommending sentence], traffic crime group, general traffic accident (type 1), mitigation area, one month to six months from the imprisonment without prison labor (decision of sentence], two months from the suspended sentence, and two years from the suspended sentence.