한국마사회법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
25,000,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
Punishment of the crime
The defendant is the number of skill belonging to the Korean Racing Association.
On July 24, 2012, the Defendant received an illegal solicitation from F to request horse racing information in the Seoul Horseacheon-si, Seoul Horse-si to provide F with horse racing information, let F transfer KRW 21 million to G account in the name of G, and provided horse information.
In addition, the Defendant received a total of KRW 25,00,000 from F in return for provision of horse information four times from the above date and time to September 15, 2012, as indicated in the attached list of crimes, and subsequently committed unlawful acts, such as providing horse information.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement acknowledged that F gave money to G, but there is no direct fact that F gives money to G.
However, according to the evidence, if the defendant sufficiently acknowledges that he had F give money to G, and if the defendant's assertion is the defendant, the F voluntarily does not have the right to receive 25 million won or more to G with no one-way way and explain the reasons for delivery.
1. Witness of H;
1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;
1. A copy of each prosecutor's statement concerning G;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of the fact of subrogation by the suspect F, debt A, and attachment of relevant data);
1. Article 53(2) and Article 53(1) of the Act on the Selection of Criminal Crimes and Article 53(1) of the Korean Racing Association (generally, referring to imprisonment), the prosecutor indicted each of the crimes of this case as concurrent crimes. However, even if the court recognizes the facts constituting the crimes prosecuted as concurrent crimes, it does not affect the defense of the defendant, and even if the court treats only the legal evaluation as to the number of crimes prosecuted as a single comprehensive crime, it does not affect the defense of the defendant. The defendant continued to commit several acts falling under the name of the same crime for a certain period under the single and continuous criminal intent, and even the legal benefits from such damage are identical
1. Article 56 of the Korean Racing Association Act;