beta
(영문) 대구고등법원 2019.10.30 2019나24101

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the remainder of damages claim, excluding the part against the defendant which became final and conclusive by a judgment of remand.

Reasons

1. The scope of this court’s trial at the first instance court, on the grounds that the Defendant primarily inflicted damage on the Plaintiff through a false report as to each of the above articles, the Plaintiff sought a corrective report as to each of the above articles and a non-performance penalty based thereon, and as a result, sought a payment of a counterargument report as to each of the above articles and a non-performance penalty as to each of the above articles on the grounds that the Plaintiff suffered damage due to each of the above articles on factual assertion. In addition, the Plaintiff sought a payment of a counterargument report as to each of the above articles and a non-performance penalty as to each of the articles, and the Defendant filed a claim for damages due to the Defendant’s tort

The court of first instance accepted the Plaintiff’s claim for damages for the portion of the article No. 2-2 and the article No. 2-3, and No. 2-6, and each of the articles No. 2-3, No. 2-6, each of the articles No. 2-3, and No. 2-4, and No. 2-5, and each of the articles No. 2-5, and No. 3, the pertinent enforcement fine for a counterargument report, and the pertinent enforcement fine for a counterargument report, ④ the Plaintiff’s claim for damages for defamation, which is part of the article No. 2-6, “The reasonable price presented by the Plaintiff was found to have violated 10%, which is the lower price limit set forth in the Enforcement Rule of the Rental Housing Act” (hereinafter “the article of this case”), and dismissed all of the Plaintiff’s other main claims and the conjunctive claims.

Accordingly, the defendant appealed against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance, and the court prior to the remand dismissed the defendant's appeal.

Therefore, the defendant appealed against the defendant in the judgment prior to remand, the part concerning the claim for the main corrective report, the part concerning the claim for enforcement fine, and the part concerning the claim for damages. The Supreme Court ruled against the defendant in the judgment prior to remand.