영업소폐쇄처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court of first instance citing the judgment of the court of first instance, the findings and judgment of the court of first instance are justifiable.
Even if the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff was neglected in the trial, there was no error as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the reasoning of this court’s judgment is added to the Plaintiff’s main grounds for appeal, such as Paragraph (2) and added additional statements such as Paragraph (3) to the indication of the relevant provisions of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the
2. Additional determination
A. The plaintiff's assertion 1) The company operated by the plaintiff (hereinafter "the company of this case").
In other words, in order to constitute an emission facility requiring permission or a report on installation under the Clean Air Conservation Act, it is not a emission facility that requires permission or a report on installation under the Clean Air Conservation Act. In other words, in the case of a painting facility, the volume of the painting facility shall be at least 5 km or the power shall be at least 2.25 km. The instant business entity shall affix a seal on the cover of a minor part in the process of restoring the external form of a motor vehicle, and as the space in the screen door on which the seal is affixed is less than 5 km and the power is less than 2.25 km, the instant business entity does not fall under the seal facilities under the above Act and subordinate statutes. (2) According to the proviso of Article 11(1)2 and [Attachment Table 1-3] of the Enforcement Decree of the Clean Air Conservation Act, it excludes emission facilities that require permission on installation of the air pollutants by classifying
The instant company falls under a place of business the amount of air pollutants generated is less than two tons a year, and even if it falls under emission facilities, it should be excluded from emission facilities that require permission for installation.
3. The defendant shall establish automobile-related facilities in the area where the business of this case is located.