도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.
1. A summary of the facts charged is a person who drives a C5 tons truck, and the Defendant Company is a corporation established for the purpose of trucking transport business.
B on December 7, 2007, 11:11 on Pyeongtaek-si, Cheongbuk-do, 2007.
L. 204-1 L. L. 204-1, L. 2.8 km, L.W., L. L. 204-1, L. L. L. 2, L.W. L. 2, L.W. 2, L.W. 1.87 tons L.W., L.W., L.W., L. 2, L.W., L.W., L.W., L.W., L., L.W., L., L.W., L., L.W., L.W., L.W., L.
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008), which provided the basis of the punishment of this case, "in case where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," which provides that "in the event that the agent, employee or other worker of the corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in connection with the business of the corporation, a fine under the relevant Article shall also be imposed on the corporation," which provides the basis of the punishment of this case, has become retroactively null and void by the Constitutional Court's decision of 17