According to the records, the appellant filed a lawsuit against the (name omitted) for the Defendant to pay KRW 22,339,510 to the Plaintiff (name omitted) on the ground that the appellant did not correct the address of the Defendant (name omitted) within the period specified in the above order for the correction of address, and the court of original judgment ordered the appellant to correct the address on June 23, 2005. The appellant filed an application for correction of the Defendant’s address to the (name omitted) branch office of the Suwon District Court. The court of original judgment may recognize the fact that the appellant dismissed the complaint of this case on the ground that the appellant did not correct the address of the Defendant (name omitted) within the period specified in the above order for the correction of address.

2. Judgment on the appellant’s assertion

The appellant asserts that the dismissal of the complaint by the court of original judgment is illegal even though the appellant filed a request for correction of the defendant, so it cannot be said that the appellant filed a request for correction of the defendant without correction even though the appellant received an order to correct the address of the defendant from the court of original judgment. As seen earlier, it cannot be said that the dismissal order of this case is legitimate. Thus, the appellant's argument is without merit.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the appellant's appeal of this case is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Bo Sang-won (Presiding Judge) Kim Jong-sung