2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

A. The Defendant occupied B-24 square meters in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gwanak-gu (hereinafter “instant land”) owned by the Republic of Korea without entering into a loan agreement or obtaining permission for use from August 1, 2005 to December 31, 2008.

B. The Plaintiff was delegated by the Republic of Korea with the authority to manage and dispose of the instant land, and to preserve and collect claims in accordance with Article 26(1)8 of the Act on the Efficient Disposal of Non-Performing Assets, etc. of Financial Institutions and the Establishment of Korea Asset Management Corporation, Article 42(1) of the State Property Act, and Article 3

C. On April 2010, the Plaintiff imposed indemnity on the Defendant pursuant to Article 51 of the State Property Act and Article 56 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act on the ground that the Plaintiff occupied the instant land without permission.

(1) The sum of the overdue interest rate of 205.8.1 to 2006.12.31 (518) 2,028,220 15.1 to 684,310.2 (821) 2,712,530. 1 to 207.1,80,92015.3.22 to 207.22,08.25 to 207.25 to 2008.31,97,920 to 207.45 to 207.25 to 207.25 to 207.22 to 2008.249,50 to 207.25 to 2010.2 (749,50, 350, 350, 207 to 208.31 to 26.48,208;

D. Calculation loan charges and adjustment loan charges for the instant land from August 1, 2005 to December 31, 2008 are as follows.

(2) On August 1, 2005, 205.8.1 to December 31, 2005.205.1,700,00 24 m24 m2,85.05,1236,620 m20.1 to December 31, 2006.31 (365), 2,130,000 m24 2,556,000 24 2,56,000 24 2,56,000,00 1 to 364 m2,56,207 m2, 208 m2,208 m2,406 m2,406 m2,406 m2,570 m2,570 m2,570 m2,207

2. Judgment on the ground of the Plaintiff’s claim

A. According to the above facts, the claim for return of unjust enrichment is based on the underlying facts.