However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2016. 6. 5. 03:10경 이천시 중리동 209-14에 있는 남천공원 내에서 피해자 C(62세) 등과 함께 술을 마시다가 피해자가 평소 피고인을 무시하고, 들고 있던 등산용 스틱으로 피고인의 다리를 툭툭 쳤다는 이유로 화가 나, 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴 부위를 1회 때리고, 피해자가 들고 있던 위험한 물건인 등산용 스틱으로 피해자의 얼굴, 배, 등 부위를 각 1회씩 때리고, 발로 피해자의 다리 부위를 2~3회 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous things with the victim who could not know the number of days of treatment, and inflicted six escapes, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C or D;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Article 258-2 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for probation and community service order, the degree of injury suffered by the victim due to the crime of this case is not easy, and the defendant did not have any record of punishment heavier than the fine, and the defendant did not have any record of punishment heavier than the fine, and the defendant's mistake is divided and reflects it, etc. shall be sentenced to the same punishment as the order.