물품대금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. On February 2, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a transaction agreement, which is a joint market transaction, with B on the same day, and the Defendant, who is the wife B, is jointly and severally liable for the payment of the goods price pursuant to the above agreement, the Defendant asserts that the Defendant is liable to pay the Plaintiff the unpaid goods price of KRW 215,468,050. However, the Defendant’s portion out of the evidence No. 1 (a transaction agreement, which is a joint market transaction) cannot be admitted as evidence because there is no other evidence to acknowledge the authenticity, and the Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.