A. On April 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) during the dry field in the Haan-gun, Haan-gun, for the use of part of the dry field together with the victim D, destroyed it by extracting up 20 parts of the bean, which the victim was deep in the dry field so that the victim would not raise crops in the dry field.

B. On May 21, 2012, at the same place as above, the Defendant destroyed the right to prevent the victim from spreading approximately 20 parts of the bean species for the said reason.

C. Around July 6, 2012, the Defendant, at the same place as above, destroyed the abandonment of 15 parts of the shouldered 15 for the said reasons. D.

On July 10, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the same place as the above paragraph, destroyed the abandonment of 15 parts of the shouldered 15 to which the victim was frighted for the said reasons.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (50,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., initial crime, agreement with the victim, reflectivity, etc.);