The Defendant offered P, Net City Q, Q, and Net City R (hereinafter, this case No. 3) as security and borrowed money from S’s representative T for the purpose of using it in debt repayment and living expenses.

At the time, the Defendant: (a) obtained a loan from the Defendant as his debt, and (b) obtained U hotel remodeling construction in order to change the name of the debtor to H by using the fact that H is seeking to change the name of the debtor; (c) obtained a request for the certificate of seal imprint and the certificate of seal imprint; and (d) obtained a false statement; and (c) obtained a delivery from the said office’s office’s office’s office’s office’s of V and 3rd M&D around January 14, 2016.

1. The act of forging a standard agreement on loan transactions and private document related to cash receipts, and the act of using a falsified document;

A. On January 14, 2016, the Defendant demanded at the above certified judicial scrivener office around January 14, 2016 that T to prepare a loan contract in the name of H, and the actual owner of the land is the Defendant, and the Defendant has the certificate of his seal impression, and the Defendant is able to prepare a contract on behalf of H, and the standard contract for loan transaction stated “H, 64. Nov. 16, 204, Y apartment, 201, 406, 201-dong 406,” in advance, as “H, 64.16, 64.16, 16, 201,”

H's seal imprint was stamped by his name.

Defendant continued to receive KRW 40,000,000 from T by cash receipt on behalf of H, but without having the authority to prepare a cash receipt on behalf of H, stated in blank as “The cash receipt, daily cash receipt: January 16, 2016; H: The recipient: A: the agent,” stating that “The cash receipt, daily cash receipt,” made use of a tample, in cash.”

H's seal imprint was stamped by his name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant is entitled to set up a standard contract for loan transaction in the name of H, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and a cash receipt.