except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 06:40 on August 10, 2013, the Defendant emitted gas from the “D cafeteria” operated by the Defendant’s wife in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, the Defendant caused danger to human life, body, or property by emitting gas, such as: (a) opening two gas conditioning gas valves installed in the main room to capture gas; (b) opening two gas conditioning gas valves installed in the main room; and (c) stating that “I will not live the same; (d) I do not have any superior with his/her family members, regardless of whether the building is a department or not”; and (e) releasing gas to E.g., “I will have no superior with them.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (including attachment of field photographs), investigation reports (in the scene of occurrence, internal photographs on the scene of occurrence, and telephone conversations of victims);

1. Article 172-2 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (not including the fact that there is no previous error for the accused and that the accused received correspondence from the victims);

1. The crime of this case committed by the Defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable consideration of the reasons for sentencing below) is not deemed to be a crime in light of the fact that the crime of this case is a very dangerous behavior that may cause human and property damage to neighboring generations.

However, it shall be taken into consideration the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was somewhat contingent in the process of fighting the wife and the couple; (b) there was no damage to human life or property; (c) the Defendant’s wife F; (d) the Defendant, who was at the place of the instant crime, agreed with the wife E; (d) the Defendant was seriously opposed to the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant did not have any criminal records exceeding the same criminal records and fines.

Various conditions of sentencing that are shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, motive of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.