beta
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.02.02 2015고정1823

폭행

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On February 8, 2015, the Defendant stated in the facts charged of the instant case that, at around 02:40 on February 8, 2015, the victim C (Woo, 43 years old) who was the Defendant’s wife at his residence B 203-dong 1905, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-si, 203, and 1905, he shouldered the Defendant, who was the Defendant’s wife, and asked him to the bath room.

The term “the victim” refers to “the victim was fluord by hand, and the victim was fluored by fluoring the victim’s brush and

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on January 28, 2016, which was after the prosecution of this case was instituted.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.