beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.09.03 2019구합54560

등록취소처분취소

Text

1. The phrase “ August 27, 2019.” written by the Defendant in the written complaint on August 22, 2019 appears to be a clerical error.

Section 8-2.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, a company engaged in environmental management agency business, etc., registered measuring agency business in the field of water quality and malodor to the Defendant on October 10, 2013, and registered measuring agency business in the atmosphere on September 27, 2018.

B. The Plaintiff’s act of measuring air pollutants on November 2015, stating false facts to the atmosphere measurement record book while performing the duty of measuring air pollutants by proxy, before being amended by Act No. 17184, Mar. 31, 2020.

The former Environmental Examination and Inspection Act (hereinafter referred to as the “former Environmental Examination and Inspection Act”).

(2) Article 18(1) of the former Environmental Examination and Inspection Act provides that “A measuring agency business for air field was suspended pursuant to Article 17(1)7 of the former Environmental Examination and Inspection Act for three months (from February 17, 2017 to May 16, 2017). Accordingly, the Plaintiff could not resume measuring agency business for air field until the Plaintiff is judged to be in conformity with accuracy management by the National Environmental Research Institute on April 2018 due to the expiration of the term of validity of accuracy management for measuring agency business owned by the Plaintiff.” (C) On August 22, 2019, the Defendant rendered a disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s registration of measuring agency business for the air field under Article 17(1)8 of the former Environmental Examination and Inspection Act (hereinafter “C”).

(ii) [based on recognition] unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, 4 to 6 (including paper numbers).

hereinafter the same shall apply.

statement, the purport of the whole pleading

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff 1) First, the plaintiff did not perform the measurement agency business for the non-party company during the period of the above suspension of business.

In other words, "where measurement agency work is performed" under Article 17 (1) 8 of the former Environmental Examination and Inspection Act.