beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.08.30 2016고단484

공무집행방해등

Text

1. The punishment of the accused shall be one year and six months;

2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of traffic laws on roads, and violation of traffic laws on roads;

A. On May 13, 2016, at around 00:21, the Defendant driven C 320-d motor vehicles under the influence of alcohol with approximately 500 meters alcohol level 0.208% while under the influence of alcohol in the influence of alcohol, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the Do in front of the public parking lot located in the two-way market in Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, Tae-gun, the Defendant, at approximately 78-132 meters away from the Do in front of the public parking lot.

B. On May 13, 2016, at around 17:10, the Defendant driven C 320D cars while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.13% while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.13%, without obtaining a driver’s license, at approximately 12 km section from the front of the said green apartment through the road 299-8, from the Do in front of the said apartment.

2. On May 13, 2016, the Defendant, at around 17:30 on May 13, 2016, received a 112 report stating that “the drinking driver is changed” at the 102 parking lot in the Taedong-gu, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, Taenam-gun, the Defendant would be required to take a drinking test from E, who was called out after receiving a 112 report and received a request for a drinking test from E, who is affiliated with the D police unit in the Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do., the Defendant would require the above E to

“In doing so, the above E was abused the floor by breaking the breath of the breath in hand, breaking the breath of the above E by drinking, twice the breath of the breath, once with the hand floor of the above E, and assaulting the head of the above E by fingers.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Statement report on the situation of the driver at each driving school and the driver's license register;

1. Application of field photographs, video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. The driving of the relevant legal provision on criminal facts: Article 148-2(2)1 of the Road Traffic Act (referred to as 0.208%) and Article 148-2(2)2 of the Road Traffic Act (referred to 0.208%).