2. The court below acknowledged the following facts based on the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e.,, C belonging to the Sungdong Police Station, which regulates the defendant's signal violation, consistently from the investigative agency to the court below, stating that "A around 1:46, May 9, 2014, the defendant observed the violation of signal signal at the shooting distance at the entrance of the Nandong, Nanyangdong, Nandong, and controlled the defendant's vehicle as one of the roads," < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 200 to 30 meters at the time of detection of the violation of signal violation; Presidential Decree No. 200 to 300 meters between C and the defendant's vehicle at the time of detection of signal violation; Presidential Decree No. 11:46, Mar. 1, 2014; Presidential Decree No. 20060, Mar. 24, 2004>

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.