보험급여징수처분 취소
1. On December 23, 2013, the Defendant’s entry in the “Collection Schedule of Insurance Benefits” as to the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff is a company that runs the business of manufacturing, installing, and selling tea plant, and is not a constructor under the Framework Act on the Construction Industry.
B. On September 17, 2013, the Plaintiff and the limited liability company heading E.S. company (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) concluded a contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Plaintiff to pay the Plaintiff KRW 5,065,00 (excluding value-added tax) of value-added tax (hereinafter “instant contract”) in consideration of the following: (a) the Plaintiff and the non-party company’s transfer of the instant factory (hereinafter “instant factory”) to the non-party company located in U.S. 208-1 (hereinafter “the instant factory”); and (b) the non-party company entered into a contract with the Plaintiff to pay the Plaintiff KRW 5,065,00 (excluding value-added tax) in consideration of the agreement.
Serial Quantity 1 JAW 4634 Mobile Installation ( Existing Goods) 1 Form 2 FED 1 Form 3VB SUPPPOT 1850 ( Existing Goods) Form 4 MC300 CON 1 Form 4 MC300 mobile installation ( Existing Goods) Category 5 CONSH1300 mobile installation ( Existing Goods) 10 type 10 type 7 de facto installation (existing Goods) 10 type 7 de facto installation (existing Goods) 10 type 8 existing equipment
C. On September 15, 2013, around September 17, 2013, the Plaintiff’s factory head and business director B designated the location to set up the instant clerit, and four employees of the State non-party company were 4 employees of the State non-party company for two to three hours. D.
B and the workers belonging to the Plaintiff were built on September 25, 2013 to move and install the instant cracks, etc. within the factory of this case.
E. Workers C belonging to the Plaintiff, and D, while engaged in dismantling containers on October 3, 2013, due to a fire-fighting phenomenon during the process of dismantling containers, and C was behind the container level, and D suffered each injury after the container level.
(f) The Plaintiff.