A A shall be punished by a fine of one million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three hundred thousand won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Defendant

A is the representative of the domestic marriage intermediary business in the name of "D" in Busan City, the third floor, and the defendant B is the same year from April 2016.

5. A person who has been in charge of the recruitment of members and counseling services in the above "D" until the first patrol officer.

1. A person who intends to run an international marriage brokerage business for Defendant B shall register with the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the area in which he/she intends to establish a brokerage office in compliance with the standards prescribed by

Nevertheless, around April 15, 2016, the Defendant run an international marriage brokerage business by receiving 2.5 million won of membership subscription terms and conditions and 2.5 million won of membership fees from E, a foreign customer who visited a place without being registered with the competent authority, for the purpose of marriage brokerage.

2. Defendant A, at the above date and place, carried out international marriage brokerage without registering as above, Defendant A, an employee of the Defendant, as the above, with respect to the Defendant’s business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. Written accusation from the head of the Busan Metropolitan City Council, and E;

1. Report of investigation (E’s statement on an excursion ship), investigation report (applicable to the suspect B’s statement on an excursion ship);

1. Article 27, Article 26(1)2, and Article 4(1)2 of the Act on the Management of Marriage Brokerage Business (the occupation of an unregistered international marriage brokerage business) Defendant B: Articles 26(1)2 and 4(1) (the occupation of an unregistered international marriage brokerage business) of the Act on the Management of Marriage Brokerage Business; Articles 26(1)2 and 4(1) (the occupation of an unregistered international marriage brokerage business); the selection of a fine;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, violated the soundness of the marriage brokerage business by running an unregistered international marriage brokerage business; and the instant case, users suffered monetary damage; however, the Defendants committed crimes.