양수금
1. The Defendants jointly and severally pay to the Plaintiff’s Intervenor KRW 36,185,284 as well as the full payment from January 7, 2016.
1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor
(a)the reasons for the attachment to the indication of the claim and each of the reasons for participation;
(However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff', and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant').
Judgment on Confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. As the Plaintiff’s determination as to the Plaintiff’s claim did not have the right by transferring the Plaintiff’s claim to the Defendants while continuing the instant lawsuit (on August 31, 2015, to the City Asset Management Loan Co., Ltd., and the City Asset Management Loan Co., Ltd., to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff on October 8, 2015), the Plaintiff’s claim is without merit.