If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

1. On October 28, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Assault, etc. against a driver) in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) takes a DNA taxi driven by the victim C (46 years old) (a taxi) who is a taxi driver on the roads near the street of young children in Jongno-gu Seoul, Jongno-gu, Seoul, and, at the vicinity of the tunnel No. 1, Namsan-dong, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, Yongsan-gu, Seoul, and without any justifiable reason, receives a demand from the victim under the influence of alcohol to inform him/her of his/her accurate destination.

The victim’s face is expressed by “, etc.” and the victim’s face is expressed by his/her hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation.

2. The Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 1, and committed assault by the Defendant on the part of the police officer F, G, and the above police officer, who received a request for returning home from the police officer F, and G belonging to the Seoul Yongsan Police Station Emba, Seoul Police Station Emba, where the Defendant used to assault the said C, with the intent of “I am going to be examined by the guide, police station,” and the said police officer “I am to be examined by the guide, and I am to the back of the patrol box on which the said police officer boardedd,” and used the said G as a defect in order to let the Defendant get off the patrol.

Since then, the Defendant left the train, the above F was a defect that the F was about to go to the chief of the patrol car, and the bridge of F was pushed in the booms of the patrol car, and the above police officers blick the Defendant on the top of the patrol car in order to arrest him as a flagrant offender, and assaulted the above police officers by getting the Defendant on the front of the patrol car in order to arrest him as a flagrant offender.

As a result, the defendant has prevented police officers from performing their legitimate duties on the prevention of crimes and criminal investigations at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness C, F and G;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to C, F, and G;

1.C’s statement;