beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.05.13 2013가합535955

물품대금

Text

1. The Defendant Korea Meteorological Industry Promotion Agency: (a) KRW 1,132,837,018 to the Plaintiff; and (b) from August 20, 2013 to May 13, 2014 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In 2011, the Defendant Promotion Agency was delegated by the Korea Meteorological Administration affiliated with the Defendant’s Republic of Korea to purchase detection equipment (LIDR; hereinafter “DAR”) on behalf of the Defendant.

Defendant Promotion Agency is D in 2011 to the Public Procurement Service under the Defendant’s Republic of Korea.

The request for purchase was made.

The Public Procurement Service is called on August 3, 201 by means of a separate bid on standards and prices.

The tender for purchase was publicly announced.

(Public Notice of Foreign Capital Notice No. 201108-01996-00). The Plaintiff and the Bank of Korea-affiliated submitted a bid proposal on September 201, 201, but the Defendant Promotion Institute decided that the Plaintiff was inappropriate in the standard evaluation procedure, and the bid was dealt with on the ground of single bid.

On November 18, 2011, the Public Procurement Service publicly announced re-tenders with the same content as the progress tender in addition to the progress by the Evaluation Committee organized by the Public Procurement Service.

(Public Notice of Foreign Capital Notice No. 2011-17641-00). According to the notice of re-tender, D:

The special provisions of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on Contracts to Which the State is a Party for a specific procurement shall apply mutatis mutandis to the purchase to the extent not contrary to the nature of the contract.

B. The Plaintiff and the Plaintiff received a bid proposal, and all of the results of the standards evaluation were determined to be appropriate. On December 21, 2011, the Plaintiff, who bid at the lowest price, was selected as the successful bidder.

On December 28, 2011, the Public Procurement Service entered into a procurement contract with the Defendant Promotion Agency, the contractor, and the Plaintiff and the supplier, the successful bidder, as the company located in France where the equipment is manufactured), and the domestic supplier, as the Plaintiff.

(hereinafter “instant contract”). C.

The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.

Type of contract: The method of bid for total amount of contract: the foreign supplier of the separate bid price and the separate bid price: The supply price for the goods supplied by Lesiopia: the windurur 200s 2 tax rate: the supply price on April 9, 2013: