(a) The name of the Defendant’s patent invention (1) invention of this case: D (2) filing date/registration date/registration number: Claim No. C (3) claims

2. Body combinations of valves 1 (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 1”); the body of the said valves 1; the re-obviousness of the said valves (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 2”); the re-obviousness of the said valves 2; the re-obviousness of the claim of the said valves 1; the re-obviousness of the claim of the said valves 2; the non-obviousness of the claim of the said valves 1; the claim of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 4”); the non-obviousness of the claim of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 2; the non-obviousness of the claim of this case”) shall be installed on the part of the above 1; the claim of this case which is linked to the claim of this case; and the non-obviousness of the claim of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “contests 2; hereinafter referred to as the “contests 1; hereinafter referred to as the “contests 6”) shall be removed from the above non-obviousness of the claim of this case.

According to this, it is obvious that the “satise valve........., equipped with the above components” is a clerical error (see, e.g., the first pleading protocol) and Paragraph 2.