Attorney C, Q, R, S, T, U

For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court did not prove a crime against the facts charged in this case.

We maintained the judgment of the court of first instance that acquitted the Defendant. The reasoning of the judgment of the court below is not recorded.

Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending logical and empirical rules.

There is no error of law by misunderstanding facts beyond the limit of the principle of proof or by misapprehending the relevant legal principles.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

of this section.

Justices Park Young-young

Justices Kim Shin-sik, Kim Jae-sik, the Republic of Korea

Justices Kim Jong-il