구상금
1. Within the scope of the property inherited from the network D, the Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A is 13,894,182 won and 13,893 among them.
Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 and Eul evidence Nos. 1, it can be acknowledged that the facts identical to the changed cause of claim, and D died on June 26, 201, and there was defendant B and C, who is the wife of the defendant A, the child of the defendant B and C, and the defendants filed a petition for a judgment on the re-approval of inheritance with the Suwon District Court Decision No. 20169, Sep. 28, 2017, for which the defendants received a report on the re-approval of succession to the deceased's property on Nov. 2, 2017.
According to the above facts, Defendant A is obligated to pay 13,894,182 won (32,419,759 x 3/7) and 13,893,756 won among them (32,418,766 x 3/7) to the Plaintiff, and Defendant B and Defendant C are obligated to pay 9,262,788 won (32,419,759 x 2/7) and 9,262,504 won (32,418,766 x 2/7) among them from September 28, 2012 to November 30, 2012, with 15% annual interest rate from the day following the day of each lawsuit to the day of full payment, etc. < Amended by Act No. 13588, Aug. 31, 2015>
The plaintiff's claim shall be accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.