When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No one may intermediate a third party's communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator or provide such services for a third party's communications.

Nevertheless, around July 2019, the Defendant obtained ‘F', a telecommunications business operator registered in B’ and ‘F', a telecommunications business operator registered in B’ in the name of the Defendant’s residence located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and provided telecommunications services provided by the telecommunications business operator for the purpose of telecommunications by selling the telecommunications services to his/her name poor persons through Kwikwikset Service.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of H, E, or B;

1. Statement of the police officer to I;

1. Written complaints and statements of J, I,K, and L;

1. A report on investigation (a confirmation on the nominal owner of each telephone number);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to relevant evidentiary materials;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and Article 30 of the same Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;