1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendant’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have convicted the Defendant of occupational breach of trust among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the

2. Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the records, it is just to maintain the judgment of the court of first instance which acquitted the defendant on the ground that there is no proof of crime regarding the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (private financial brokerage, etc.) among the facts charged in this case, for the reasons stated in its reasoning. There is no violation of the law of logic and experience and the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or violation of the law of violation

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.