However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 10, 2014, at around 14:00, the Defendant prepared “C” using a computer at the Defendant’s residence in Cheongdo-gun B, Cheongdo-gun, and printed it into A4 paper, and attached a registration number plate made by attaching it on the Acryp board made of the size of the registration number plate to the Dbenz vehicle operated by the Defendant.

The Defendant, from the above date to 16:00 of the same month, driven the cargo vehicle with the forged registration number plate attached, and operated the members of Cheongdo-gun.

For this purpose, the defendant forged a motor vehicle registration number plate of air, and exercised a forged motor vehicle registration number plate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police seizure record and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning stolen and stolen vehicle tax data, comprehensive vehicle tax data, and automobile tax;

1. Article 238 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 78 subparagraph 2 of the Automobile Management Act, and Article 71 (1) of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act for forfeiture are against the Defendant’s wrongness; the circumstances leading to the instant crime; the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, means and consequence of the crime; and other circumstances constituting the conditions for sentencing, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as indicated in the Disposition.