도로법위반
The defendant is innocent.
The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the employee A violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management authority by loading and operating the freight to exceed the limit on the reduction of the B vehicle and the total weight on the road in front of the traffic patrol site located in the 479-dong 479 Sin-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, Do-dong, by around January 12, 1994.
However, Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995) which is the applicable provisions of the above facts charged retroactively loses its effect according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality on Dec. 29, 201.
Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.