Defendant C and D jointly share to Plaintiff A with KRW 500,00,000,000.

(2) On April 1, 2017, Plaintiff B and Defendant E were playing in the F apartment Gdong complex located in Hanam-si on April 1, 2017, and Plaintiff A and Defendant C reported their respective children in the said playground.

(3) While Plaintiff B was going up with the slock play facilities installed in the above playground, Defendant E was slicking Plaintiff B’s her rear and her hand at two times his son’s rear and her hand (hereinafter “instant assault”), and Plaintiff B was in excess of the future.

(A) On 12:10 to 12:17, the above video CD No. 2 (hereinafter “instant video”). (4) The Plaintiff, who directly tested this Chapter, directly, asked Defendant E for the reasons that Defendant E would not have followed the following actions, and then, the Plaintiff C, who took part of Defendant E’s right shoulder and took part of Defendant E at approximately 3-4 meters away.

(5) The Plaintiffs asserted that Defendant E refused to go to Plaintiff B, and that Defendant E was at the time of the Plaintiff’s shoulder and the Plaintiff’s bridge once. In part 14:35 of the above film, Defendant E appears in the face that Defendant E was able to display the Plaintiff’s hand to Plaintiff B, but it is not clearly confirmed whether this is an assault or not). (5) Plaintiff A and Defendant C divided about five minutes of a five-minute dialogue.

Plaintiff

Unlike A, Defendant C and D, who did not directly witness the scene of the instant assault, confirmed the instant images through the apartment management office, and thought that Plaintiff A had led Defendant E to the suppression of excessive trees.

Accordingly, Defendant D asked Plaintiff A to walk a telephone around the day of the occurrence of the case, and Defendant D demanded Plaintiff A to go on the wind that Plaintiff A turns Defendant E with the wind that Defendant E was frighted, which caused Defendant E to play.

Defendant D.