When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 13, 2017, at around 12:20, the Defendant stated that “D” in the mutual restaurant called “D” operated by the victim C (the 65-year-old) in Gunsan City B, the mother is working, and Defendant’s daily work inside the said restaurant is not required to first request and obtain permission prior to entering the restaurant, or is allowed to move to other customers as soon as possible.” However, as to this part, the Defendant was acquitted in the criminal trial of the crime of insult against the victim.

In the case of other customers, the victim publicly insultingd the victim by stating that “I ambien, I amben, I amben, I amben, I amben,” and “I amben.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E, F and G;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;