Therefore, the victim continued to demand the movement of the above vehicle, attached the defendant's marking to the defendant, and the defendant neglected to take care of the victim when he rootss the above vehicle, but neglected to do so, the defendant's body and spread the defendant's body and caused the defendant's drinking to faced with the baby of the victim, thereby resulting in the victim's 28-day medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. According to the prosecutor’s evidence and video CDs, the following facts are recognized:

D as security guards of the C building, the vehicle of the defendant parked in front of the C building at the time of the instant case was unable to move out of the other vehicle, and the defendant who was in the drinking house adjacent to the C building was called the deduction of the vehicle by telephone.

The Defendant, upon receiving a telephone, she called D to get off his/her drunk person, because she was under the influence of alcohol, but D said D said D was unable to put him/her to go through the Defendant’s two arms, while she said D said her to have his/her arm’s length cut off.

Accordingly, the Defendant spreaded the attached arms D, and was in line with D's arms during which he was in line with D's arms.

(1) During approximately one minute of video play time, the Defendant entered D into a place where the damage was inflicted, and D put the Defendant’s arms, or prevented them from putting them in front.

B. According to this, even though the defendant tried not to drive a drunkly, D calls for unreasonable deduction of the motor vehicle from the defendant, and sells the defendant.