However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 30, 2016, at around 01:50, the Defendant made a call at around 01:50, the Defendant’s head part of the victim’s head one time on the glass cup, which is a dangerous object on the table, and on the ground that the Defendant’s husband made a telephone call with the Defendant’s husband at the E main point located in Yasan-si, Yasan-do.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted a tear on the number of days of treatment to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes for reporting internal accidents;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Where the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of the recommended sentence] general injury [the person subject to special mitigation] [the person subject to special mitigation] or considerable damage has been recovered from the basic area (including efforts to recover damage], or where he/she committed a crime by the threat of collective force or multiple groups or by carrying with himself/herself a deadly weapon or other dangerous articles (except where the crime subject to habitual injury, repeated injury, or special injury is applicable] [the decision of sentence] the defendant is against his/her mistake, the fact that the defendant has agreed and agreed with the victim, other circumstances which form the conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, circumstances leading to this case, sexual behavior, environment, etc., and the sentence shall be determined as per the order.