Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

The defendant is a mother for worship as a D church believers.

On April 2, 2017, the Defendant, around 11:30 and around 3:11, 200, sent approximately 20 people around E-1, E-1, a 1st century, saying, the Defendant was the victim C with a large sound, saying, “Any female body is a sexual indecent act committed against the deceased and the deceased.”

Accordingly, the Defendant insultingd the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. The written statement by the police against C (the defense counsel asserts to the effect that the defendant's act constitutes a justifiable act).

However, in light of the circumstances acknowledged by the evidence of this case and the Defendant’s speech and behavior and circumstances before and after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the Defendant’s act does not violate the social norms.

We do not accept the above argument.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 32 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits to Dismiss Application for Compensation;