If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

No person may provide telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator for any third person's communications.

Nevertheless, around July 2019, the Defendant reported the B B B B B B B B B, stating “Carryingphones, fluences,” and sent it to the winners by opening the cell phone heart in the name of the Defendant, and promised to receive KRW 500,000 won per page by opening the cell phone heart in the name of the Defendant, and sent the identification cards necessary for opening the cell phone heart to the above needy party, and using this, the needy party opened the cell phone C’s heart in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another's communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on the written statement by the police against D and the Kakao Stockholm conversation;

1. Article 97 of the relevant Act on Criminal Facts and Articles 97 and 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act on the Selection of Punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;