beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.06.04 2020고정471

관광진흥법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

A person who intends to operate a camping ground business shall have facilities, equipment, etc. suitable for camping and register with the competent authority.

Nevertheless, from June 2013 to August 2019, the Defendant, with the trade name of “C” from Macheon-si from 15 to Hacheon-si, operated a camping site business by having 30,000 won per day for many unspecified customers visiting the place with a swimming pool, repair stand, etc. and lending the place for camping.

Accordingly, the defendant operated camping business without being registered with the competent authorities.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the accusation and attachment;

1. Article 83 (2) and Article 4 (1) of the Tourism Promotion Act and the selection of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) are the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant acknowledged the facts charged in the instant case and reflects his mistake, and that the defendant is the first offender without any previous

However, the size of the camping site operated by the Defendant without being registered with the competent authority is reasonable, and its operating period is more than six years, and the instant “C” appears to continue to be operated until now, and it seems that real-time reservations through the Defendant’s Internet homepage (see, e.g., No. 12 of the evidence record) indicated by the Defendant D as his/her representative are still possible, and the recent visit period of female visitors to “C” can also be easily found through Internet search.

Considering the unfavorable circumstances, it is judged that the punishment of the summary order on the defendant is not excessive.

In addition, the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, occupation, character and conduct, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., are shown.