beta
(영문) 서울고법 1972. 12. 13. 선고 72나412 제9민사부판결 : 상고

[손해배상청구사건][고집1972민(2),433]

Main Issues

The case holding that the State cannot be regarded as an accident which has operated an automobile for itself or a public official has caused the execution of his duties.

Summary of Judgment

When a private soldier who is engaged in the security service other than a driver'sdo has caused an accident while driving his/her car by linking the scam scambling electric wires under the influence of alcohol, regardless of his/her duties, it cannot be deemed that a public official has occurred in the course of performing the national affairs or that the State has operated a motor vehicle for his/her own sake.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, Article 2 of the State Compensation Act

Plaintiff, appellant and appellee

Plaintiff 1 and two others

Defendant, appellant and appellee

Korea

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul Central District Court (70 Gohap6383) in the first instance trial

Text

The original judgment has been revoked, and the plaintiffs' claims (including the expansion of claims according to the lawsuit system) corresponding thereto have been dismissed.

The plaintiffs' appeal (including the extension of the above claim) is dismissed.

All the costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs in the first and second instances.

Purport of claim

The defendant shall pay 6,919,578 won to the plaintiff 1, 2,366,529 won to the plaintiff 2, and 200,000 won to the plaintiff 3, and 5% interest per annum from January 11, 1969 to the day of full payment.

The judgment that the lawsuit costs should be borne by the defendant (the amendment of the purport of the lawsuit from the trial to the succession of the lawsuit due to the death of the plaintiff 1)

Purport of appeal

Plaintiffs: Judgment such as cancellation of original judgment and entry of purport of claim

Defendant: Judgment as per Disposition

Reasons

In light of the above facts, Gap 3's evidence 2, Eul 9 to 12, and non-party 2's testimony of the court below that the defendant's act of operating the above 3 driver's license of the above non-party 3, the defendant's act of operating the above 9 driver's license of the above non-party 1 and the non-party 3's testimony and oral argument that the non-party 1's act of operating the above 9 driver's license of the above non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 9's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 3's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 9's non-party 1's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1's non-party 2's non-party 1'.

Judge Jeon Soo-chul (Presiding Judge)