2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. 1) The Land Survey Division (No. 3-1) drawn up in the Japanese colonial era (No. 3-1), C (C; hereinafter referred to as “C in the name of assessment”).

(ii) This is indicated as being the assessment of the “21 square meters preceding D, Gyeong-gun, Kim Yong-gun, and even in the closed land register and land cadastre (Evidence A-2 of the evidence No. 1-2), C, which is the assessment of the said land on September 30, 1911, is indicated as being the assessment of the said land. Moreover, in the land survey register and the closed land register, entry of C, which is the assessment title, is omitted. (ii) The said land was converted into the area of the land indicated in Paragraph (1) of the Disposition No. 1 (hereinafter “the instant land”).

B. 1) Plaintiff’s prior E (E, hereinafter “Plaintiff’s prior E”)

(B) On November 9, 1933, G, South-Nam, Ha, and Tri-W I between the wife F and the wife F, and died on November 9, 193.2) G had six son as follows, and died on December 12, 1930.

K M P I O S U W L N Q R T V 3) 원고의 선대 E이 1933. 11. 9. 사망함에 따라 K가 호주상속인으로서 그 재산을 단독으로 상속하였는데, 그 후 1952. 1. 25. 미혼인 상태로 사망함에 따라 형망제급(兄亡弟及) 원칙에 의하여 민법 부칙(1958. 2. 22. 법률 제471호로 제정된 것) 제25조 제1항 및 조선민사령 제11조 제1항에 의하면, 제정 민법 시행 전에 개시된 상속은 관습에 의한다. 민법 시행 전에 호주가 사망한 경우에 그 유산은 호주상속인이 단독으로 상속하는 것이 그 당시의 관습이다(대법원 1990. 10. 30. 선고 90다카23301 판결 등 참조). 한편, 민법 시행 전의 관습(이하 ‘구 관습’이라 한다

According to the foregoing, Australia died without a male who is to inherit, and in the case of unmarried persons at the time of death, the Dong head of the deceased Australia succeeds to the family (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Da251508, Mar. 24, 2016) (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2015Da251508, Mar. 24, 201). S has the Plaintiff as its child.