2. The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

1. No person who is a defendant A shall hunting in a place other than a hunting ground;

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on February 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) launched two ball cartridgess with hunting guns (number E), which were found to have a rush ground in an area that cannot be established as a hunting ground due to an urban area under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act; and (b) hunted them at a place other than a hunting ground.

2. No person who is a defendant B shall hunting in a place other than a hunting ground;

Nevertheless, at around 16:00 on February 4, 2013, the Defendant: (a) launched one ball gun with a hunting gun (No. 1 f) discovered and possessed a ostrine, and hunted it in a place other than a hunting ground, even in an area where it cannot be established as a hunting ground because it was an urban area under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act, under the National Land Planning and Utilization Act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of witness G;

1. Statement made by the police officer in relation to H;

1. On-site photographs and map images;

1. Application of each of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes of the separated shot guns (No. 1), and shot guns (No. 2);

1. Defendants: Article 69 (1) 12 and Article 42 (2) of the Wildlife Protection and Management Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants: Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act or more.