[강간치사피고사건][고집1976형,140]
The case recognizing the establishment of the crime of death or injury resulting from rape in the event that rape has been committed.
Even if the rape was committed, if the crime of rape was caused by assaulting the means of rape, the crime of death resulting from rape is established.
Articles 301 and 297 of the Criminal Act
Defendant
Defendant
Daejeon District Court (76 High Court Decision 76Gohap12)
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
135 days from the number of days of confinement before the pronouncement of this judgment shall be included in the punishment of the original court.
The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defendant and his defense counsel is as follows: first, since the defendant did not rape the victim in this case, the so-called crime of attempted rape and the crime of homicide resulting from violence is not established, but there is an error of mistake and violation of law affecting the conclusion of the judgment in the original judgment that applied the defendant to the crime of rape resulting from rape. Second, the amount of punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
그러므로 먼저 항소이유 첫째점에 관하여 살피건대, 원심이 적법하게 조사 채택한 여러 증거들을 기록에 비추어 종합검토하여 보면, 원심이 판시한 범죄사실을 충분히 인정할 수 있고 그 사실에 의하면 이건 피해자와 함께 탄 택시안에서 갑자기 욕정을 일으켜 강간할 것을 결의하고 동 택시를 정차시켜 1976.1.1. 02:00경 원판시 포푸라밭까지 강제로 끌고간 후 오른팔로 동녀의 목을 껴안아 키스를 하면서 뒤로 넘어뜨리고 동녀의 팬티를 벗기려 하였으나 동녀가 저항하면서 피고인의 혓바닥을 물자 반항을 억압하려고 주먹과 발로 동녀의 얼굴등 온몸을 마구 때리고 차서 동녀로 하여금 이로 인한 좌측측두부경뇌막하출혈로 사망에 이르게 하였다는 것인바, 비록 강간미수에 그친 경우라도 강간의 수단이 된 폭행으로 인하여 치사케하였다면 강간미수치사죄가 성립한다고 할 것이므로 원심이 위와 같은 피고인의 소위를 강간미수치사죄로 처단하였음은 정당하고 이를 비난하는 논지는 이유없다.
Then, examining the second reasons for appeal in detail various circumstances, such as the motive, means, result, age, character and conduct, environment, criminal record, and circumstances after the crime, etc. of this case, the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is inappropriate and too unreasonable, even if considering the circumstances asserted by the defendant, since it is not considered that the sentence imposed by the court below against the defendant is too unreasonable. Thus, the grounds for appeal by the defendant cannot be accepted.
Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and 135 days out of the detention days prior to the judgment of the court below shall be included in the sentence of the court below by applying Article 57 of the Criminal Act. It is so decided as per
Judges Limited Jin-jin (Presiding Judge)