beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.11 2017가합534394

원인자 부담금 청구

Text

1. The Defendant: 406,572,00 won for the Plaintiff Sejong Telecom Co., Ltd.; and 59,90,000 won for the Plaintiff Trod Co., Ltd.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. As a key telecommunications business operator under the Telecommunications Business Act, the Plaintiffs: (a) leased electric poles from the Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Electric Power Corporation”); and (b) installed telecommunications facilities and equipment on the electric poles and provided neighboring users with common telecommunications services, such as Internet, cable TV, etc., by obtaining permission from the Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Electric Power Corporation”); and (c) installed facilities and equipment on the electric poles.

B. The Defendant’s subway Extension Corporation and Communications Equipment Removal Request 1) The Incheon Metropolitan City Urban Railroad Headquarters under the Defendant’s jurisdiction (hereinafter “In Incheon Urban Railroad Headquarters”).

(1) From September 30, 2014 to November 27, 2018, the construction period was the period of construction, and the construction period was 2,162 meters in total from Bupyeong-gu, Seogdong to Seonam-dong, Seognam-dong, and the construction period was 2,162 meters in total to build the extension section of 7 Seoul Urban Railroad Line 7, Seoul Urban Railroad Line 7, and the construction period was hereinafter referred to as the “instant subway Corporation,” and the land in the said construction section is “the instant land”.

(2) In the process of performing the instant subway construction, the Incheon Urban Railroad Headquarters promoted the entire removal of electric poles installed within the construction section. During that process, from February 2015 to April 2015, it sent to the Plaintiffs a written request for consultation to remove processing lines installed within the instant land on each date indicated below.

(B) In the event that the Plaintiffs are individually named, the part of the “stock company” among the trade names is omitted, and Plaintiff SKBD Co., Ltd. is referred to as “Plaintiff SKBD”). The matters requested for consultation on the date of sending the recipient are as follows: Plaintiff SKB on April 22, 2015, requesting the relocation of five processing lines on April 11, 2015, requesting the relocation of seven processing lines on February 11, 2015. < Amended by Act No. 13183, Feb. 13, 2015>