소유권이전등기
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
purport.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts, which have been dismissed or re-written as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of
2. It shall be written that " October 3, 2018," "No. 30, 2018," written or re-written, No. 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, was " October 30, 2018."
The 9th judgment of the first instance court "this court" shall be applied to the "court of the first instance".
Part 12 through 15 of the judgment of the first instance shall be replaced by the following:
3. Judgment on the plaintiff's eligibility for conversion for sale in lots
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) on August 4, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that all the members of the lessee’s household have to move into the rental house before a certain reason for transfer occurred. As the Plaintiff’s father’s ground for transfer of the right of lease of the instant apartment was around September 1, 2015, the Plaintiff did not actually meet the requirements of Article 12(3)3 of the instant lease agreement and Article 21(1)3 of the former Rental Housing Act as the lessee who had not resided in the Incheon city from the end of April 24, 2017, and did not reside in the apartment house after April 24, 2017. The Plaintiff did not meet the requirements of Article 19(3)3 of the former Rental Housing Act and Article 18(1)1 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act, since the transfer of the right of lease to the Plaintiff did not actually meet the requirements of Article 18(1)1 of the former Enforcement Decree of the Rental Housing Act.
C. The plaintiff does not belong to the plaintiff.