농수산물의원산지표시에관한법률위반등
The judgment of the court below is reversed.
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. According to the summary of the grounds of appeal (In fact-finding assertion), H, J, F’s statement, and the source of origin marking photographs attached to the D cafeterias, etc., the Defendant kept the Republic of Korea rocketing in the outer right legator of the above cafeterias from around December 2, 2012 to March 27, 2013, and sells the Republic of Korea rocketing to customers as if the Defendant had completed the work of domestic production; the Defendant, on March 27, 2013, placed the place of origin on the cafeterias attached to the cafeterias, sold them to customers as if they were domestic production; the Defendant’s place of origin in the above cafeterias on March 27, 2013, which was the control date of the investigative agency of the above cafeterias, indicated “in Korea,” and indicated “in Korea,” the Defendant’s change of the place of origin to indicate “in Korea” before the rocketings,” and at the same time, sold agricultural and fishery products with the purpose of sale under the instant charges.
2. Determination
A. A. The prosecutor’s ex officio determination of the facts charged in the instant case at the trial: (a) indicated the part of paragraph (1) of the facts charged in the instant case as “The Defendant: (a) indicated the “in front of a while indicating it as a domestic acid,” and indicated that the Defendant’s “inward” was “in front of a restaurant,” and indicated as “in the front of a restaurant,” and indicated as “in the front of a restaurant,” and indicated as “in the front of a restaurant, the indication of origin is damaged by means of its deletion)” in the meracle 1, 2013, which is placed inside the restaurant, to store strings used as cooking materials, such as rackers, etc. in the instant restaurant; and (b) indicated as “in the middle of a restaurant, rice, racks, and shots, etc., on the me new plate posted inside the restaurant.