A. The Plaintiff received 1,631,321 5,08, 2079, 719,528, 528 2, 200. 24,440,55,335, 995, 335 14,742,871, 8714 new card loan 11,816,698, 341, 257, 955, 528, 395, 353 of 200. 29. 29. 14,742, 928, 939, 943, 56, 8714, 11,698, 341, 257, 955, 34, 6305, 257, 294, 251, 3614, 2965, 201.

(b) Judgment by service based on which recognition is applicable (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

2. The Plaintiff asserts that (i) Defendant A received special claim 1,559,284 won (i.e., 750,000 won interest in arrears) from Defendant A, and (ii) Defendant B jointly and severally guaranteed Defendant A’s obligation with respect to credit card payment under the No. 3 of the above table.

In 198, Defendant A made a loan from a national bank, a principal loan institution.

No evidence exists to deem that Defendant B provided joint and several surety for Defendant A’s new card payment. Thus, this part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is dismissed as it is without merit.