When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person may intermediate a third party's communications or provide a third party for communications using telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator.

Nevertheless, on March 9, 2019, the Defendant sent a notice to the effect that “The Defendant will offer 30,000 won per opening on the condition of opening a wire chip,” and received 30,000 won in return for face-to face-to-face in return for the Defendant’s identification card, photograph, and power of attorney online to the radiophone agencies from around the day to March 12, 2019 designated by the above winners of name from around the day from March 9, 2019, the Defendant provided the Defendant’s identification card, photograph, and power of attorney online to the radiophone agencies from March 12, 2019, and opened the Defendant’s phone number C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, and L’s prepaid chip, and provided telecommunications services provided by the telecommunications business operator to others for communications purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement of M;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation of suspects;

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the relevant Act and Articles 97 and 30 of the Telecommunications Business Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is highly likely to cause social harm and punishment due to the act that facilitates other crimes, such as scam, etc., and the number of telephone numbers provided by the defendant as the crime of this case reaches 10, etc., which are disadvantageous to

However, with respect to the violation of the Telecommunications Business Act, which was additionally committed by the defendant at the time of the crime of this case, the defendant was issued a summary order of a fine of KRW 2 million, and the defendant's age, occupation, character, conduct, environment, etc.