If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 00:10 on December 6, 2009, the Defendant reported to 112 that the Defendant would receive police assistance in front of the Seo-gu Incheon B apartment guard room.

It is asked whether a slope C and a policeman D were reported as a son's Day, who was called to the site, and he expressed his desire to the assistant police officer and saluted him.

Then, on the ground that there is a defect that slope C will continue to take a bath and arrest the flag as obstruction of performance of official duties, it was assaulted that the face of slope C was taken twice a week by drinking, and that the sloping C and D were moved to E area after the arrest, and when the head of the slope C and D were taken once within the patrol vehicle moving to E area.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;