1. From June 10, 2013 to March 15, 2016, the Defendant in violation of the Public Health Act provided beauty art business by providing the following services using cosmetics to an unspecified number of customers face for the sale of cosmetics at the “D” shop operated by the Defendant in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju without reporting beauty art business to the competent administrative agency.

2. On March 28, 2016, at around 15:05, the Defendant violated the Cosmetics Act indicated “E” as “E” on the signboard prior to the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) and indicated “E” as “E” in front of the place, and installed an advertisement or drug likely to be identified as an advertisement or drug, which is marked as effective in the improvement of Eibaba and skin tons, the disinfection and purification of the removal of water oreciating parts/cogn, the disinfection of the removal of cyabaculums/cogn, the organ recycling/regn improvement of the anti-explosionr, the management/confluoration of the Malibabacsation/regn, and the new concept of skin science kin Skin Skincibacin Scibacine free consultation, the target of the application, drick, the sofacin, the softener, the sofet, the softened, the skin, the colored, the colored, the advertising, the advertisement, the advertising, the advertising advertisement.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect of the police accused;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a business trip report, collection photograph, cosmetic laps and product description, purchase place, and sales place;

1. Relevant Articles 20 (1) 1 and 3 (1) of the Public Health Control Act concerning criminal facts, and Articles 37 (1) and 13 (1) 1 of the Cosmetics Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or above;