When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

No person may provide telecommunications services provided by a telecommunications business operator for any third person's communications.

Nevertheless, on July 2019, the Defendant opened a cell phone basin chip and sold it, and then contacted the name-free persons who became aware of the price with the arm’s length through the arm’s length and the arm’s length and the arm’s length of the Defendant with the information necessary for the opening of the prepaid chip. The Defendant provided the above name-free persons with the information necessary for the opening of the prepaid chip, and let the name-free persons open the prepaid chip in total eight times, including B1 lines (C), D2 lines (E, F), G Albon 2 lines (H, I), Jalopon 2 lines (K, L), Malopon 2 lines (N, N, andO).

Accordingly, the defendant provided telecommunications services provided by telecommunications business operators for another's communications.

Summary of Evidence

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the accused in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the submission of a suspected suspect's conviction number, a report on internal investigation (related to the submission of criminal investigation records), a report on investigation (related to the details of financial transactions of a suspect), a report on investigation (related to the preparation of a suspect's report), and a report on investigation (report on confirmation of the unification of cellular phones in the name of

1. Article 97 subparagraph 7 of the Telecommunications Business Act and Articles 97 and 30 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;