해임처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and thus, it is consistent with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance as follows.
On the 6th, 6, 9, 13, and 14th, each “this Court” used “6, 6, 9, 13, and 14 of the first instance judgment” as “the court of the first instance,” and “the court of the first instance submitted a written statement (No evidence No. 6) stating that “the plaintiff has no personal contact with him for the purpose of examination of witness” at the court of the first instance, and “6,” “6,” added “6,” and “the 7th, 6th, of the first instance judgment of the first instance,” which read “the 8th, 6th, and 11 of the first instance judgment of the first instance court of the first instance” as “the 6th, 6th,” and “the 111th of the second instance judgment of the first instance court of the first instance,” and “the following additional statement or evidence No. 81 of the first instance judgment of the first instance is insufficient in light of the following evidence No. 1 and evidence No. 81 of the first instance judgment.
2. The judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.